Fiasp, manufactured by Novo Nordisk, is the newest “rapid-acting” insulin on the market. So rapid that it’s often referred to as "ultra-rapid". Of course, I had to try it, right?
What’s different about Fiasp?
Novo Nordisk reports that Fiasp appears in your bloodstream within approximately 2.5 minutes after injection or delivery via insulin pump, compared to Novolog which takes about 15 minutes to appear in your bloodstream.
Fiasp is nearly identical to Novolog, except for two differences: it contains vitamin B3, also known as “niacinamide,” and L-Arginine, a “naturally occurring” amino acid.
Vitamin B3: The addition of this B3 vitamin is intended to increase the rate at which the insulin is absorbed into your tissue and bloodstream, which means it can begin affecting your blood sugar more quickly, too.
L-Arginine: This additional amino acid is said to improve the stability of the insulin, ensuring it is working to manage your blood sugar more steadily once the dose is fully active within your bloodstream.
“The good news is that it is faster than the rapid insulins we’ve been using for the past 15+ years (aspart, lispro, glulisine – brand names Novolog/Novorapid, Humalog, Apidra),” explains Gary Scheiner, MS, CDE from Integrated Diabetes Services and author of Think Like a Pancreas. “The bad news is that it is just slightly faster, and still nowhere near as fast-acting as the insulin the pancreas produces. It’s also not quite as fast as inhaled insulin (Afrezza) or injections of rapid insulin given into muscle.”
Mixed Reviews From the Type 1 Community
When asking the type 1 diabetes (T1D) community online about their Fiasp experience, I received mixed reviews. Everyone seemed to fall into 3 different categories:
- It affects their blood sugar no differently than Novolog and Humalog.
- They experienced an overwhelming number of severe low blood sugars.
- It seemed to work less effectively than Novolog or Humalog.
Certainly, there are several variables that can influence a person’s experience, but like all medications, no one size fits all and experiences on a medication vary greatly from person-to-person.
My Experience Using Fiasp
I currently take insulin via multiple daily injections (MDI) using Novolog for meals and corrections, Lantus for my background (basal) insulin.
When I first started Fiasp back in late January 2020, I was also battling a little sore throat and cold, as well as the stress of buying a new home, selling the old one, and moving into the new home. The stubborn blood sugars I was experiencing after switching to Fiasp could easily be attributed to the combination of a mild cold virus and the chaos of moving.
What I experienced was taking my usual correction and seeing little to no change in my blood sugar in the 3 hours that followed. It would take at least two correction doses to get me back down into range. After a few days of this struggle, I finally increased my background insulin, assuming the problem was my temporarily increased stress level.
It’s tricky to create enough solid experiments to test what’s really going on in a blood sugar predicament because there are so many variables at play. (Add a 2.5-year-old and a 5-year-old to the mix, and many experiment opportunities go by the wayside of parenting.)
It takes time to accumulate enough solid experiments to make a conclusion about something as vague as “is this insulin working as efficiently for me as my previous insulin?”
Now, nearly two months later, I feel confident in saying that Fiasp does not work as well for me as Novolog.
Here's what I’ve been able to pinpoint:
- I need more Fiasp for a meal than I usually need of Novolog. I would estimate about 20 to 30 percent more! I’m concluding this based on seeing my usual doses for routine meals leaving me with blood sugars in the mid-200s.
- I also continue to need more insulin to correct basic high blood sugars. I’m used to 1 unit of Novolog dropping my blood sugar by 75 points, so I’m generally very careful when measuring correction doses of insulin. When my blood sugar does finally come down, I anticipate it dropping low because of how much insulin it took to get it down! But it often just settles back around 100 mg/dL.
- My A1c had also risen from 6.3 to 7.1 percent! I haven’t been over 6.5 percent in years, so I was a little startled to see this jump in my results.
- Lastly, the lows I've experienced have definitely been under 50 mg/dL more often than I’ve ever experienced. I’ve seen blood sugars in the 40s and 30s more times in the last two months than I’ve seen in a long, long time!
For me, I’m not so sure Fiasp offers any benefits over Novolog. I need less Novolog and I'm more able to predict its impact. I’ll be returning to Novolog as soon as I finish this last pen of Fiasp -- if insulin weren’t so expensive, I’d love to switch back to Novolog right now!
My First Day Back on Novolog
Update: My first day back on Novolog confirmed my theory that Fiasp was the culprit of my stubborn heads and post-meal spikes. After just my first meal dosing Novolog again, it was remarkably relieving to see that the dose I took covered the carbohydrates in my meal as intended.
My body is very sensitive to Novolog. My body is not nearly as sensitive to Fiasp.
Why? Heck, I can’t tell ya. But I’m glad I took the time to try it, and even gladder that I realized it was the culprit behind my frustrating high numbers lately.